Untitled Document
       
    Home | Login   
     
       
 
Untitled Document
    About NCPAH
   
 About us
   
 History
   
 P.F.D.Cs
   
 Plasticulture
   
 Applications
    Information
   
 News
   
 Articles
   
 Schemes
   
 Package Practise
   
 Miscellaneous
 
    Publications
   
 At a Glance
   
 Subscribe Publ.
 
    Contact Info
   
 Contact Us
   
 Feed Back
 
    Events & Notifications
   
 Current Events
   
 Past Events
   
Area on which
P.F.D.Cs Work
 
   
 
 
 
 
Pressurised Irrigation
 
 
  PLASTICULTURE APPLICATIONS
 
MICROIRRIGATION
 
1.1 Introduction
Globally, fresh water at a tune of 3,240 M km3 is being utilized. Of this, 69% is being used in agriculture sector, 8% in domestic, 23% in industrial and other sector. In India, around 88% water is being used in agriculture sector, covering around 85Mha area under irrigation. Due to liberalization of industrial policies and other developmental activities, the demand for water in industrial and domestic sectors is increasing day by day, which forces to reduce the percentage area under irrigation. The growing demand from the population calls for more efforts to enhance agricultural production. The horticulture sector has emerged as a promising area for diversification in agriculture on account of high income generation for unit area, water and other farm inputs and environmental friendly production systems. Government of India accorded high priority for development of this sector since VIII plan by enhancing the Plan Grant from Rs 24 crores in VII plan to Rs 1000 crores.

Efforts were initiated to develop irrigation potential from the first five-year plan. The present total irrigated area in the country is about 40% of the total sown area. The conventional system of irrigation employing different methods like flooding, furrow, basin and border irrigation revolve around the concept of replenishing the moisture level to field capacity only after depletion by 50-60% of field capacity. These surface methods of irrigation have several disadvantages as listed below.
 
Disadvantages of surface irrigation methods
  • Loss of water through deep percolation
  • Loss of nutrients through leaching beyond root zone
  • Ground water pollution through leaching of agrochemicals beyond root zone and surface water pollution through runoff water.
  • Salinization/alkalization of soil.
  • Plant suffers from water stress due to both water scarcity and water logging.
  • Plant nutrient uptake may not be optimum due to unfavourable soil water regime in the root zone.
  • Plant is more susceptible to soil borne diseases.
  • More Insect pest attack.
  • Labour intensive.
The comparative irrigation efficiencies under different methods of irrigation is given in the following Table 1.1
 
Table 1.1 Irrigation Efficiencies under Different Methods of Irrigation (Percent)
 
Irrigation Efficiencies Methods of Irrigation
Surface Sprinkler Drip
Conveyance efficiency 40-50 (canal)60-70 (well) 100 100
Application efficiency 60-70 70-80 90
Surface water moisture evaporation 30-40 30-40 20-25
Overall efficiency 30-35 50-60 80-90
Source: Sivanappan, R. K. (1998) Status, scope and future prospects of microirrigation in India. Proc. Workshop on microirrigation and sprinkler irrigation system. CBIP New Delhi, April 28-30, 1998: 1-7
 
Presently, the problem facing the country is not the development of water resources, but their management in a sustainable manner. The need of the day is to economize water in agriculture and to bring more area under irrigation, reduce the cost of irrigation on unit land and increase the yield per unit area and unit quantum of water. This can be achieved only by introducing advance irrigation methods like microirrigation. This when done will not only improve the water productivity, but also results in arresting the water logging and secondary salinization problems of the canal command areas and check the receding water table and deteriorating water quality in the command areas.

The modern methods of irrigation have surely number of advantages over the conventional irrigation methods like border, check basin, furrow or surge irrigation. Table 1.2 shows some of the important points of differences between modern and other methods of irrigation.

If we could convert sizeable part of irrigated areas into modern irrigation systems, considerably more area can be brought under irrigation along with increasing the land and water productivities. The potential for coverage under drip and sprinkler irrigation is estimated to be about 27 and 42.5 M ha respectively as per the following breakup given in Table 1.3.
 
Table 1.2 Comparative Performance of Conventional irrigation with Microirrigation
 
Performance Indicator Conventional Irrigation methods Microirrigation
Water saving Waste lot of water. Losses occur due to percolation, runoff and evaporation 40-70% of water can be saved over conventional irrigation methods. Runoff and deep percolation losses are nil or negligible.
Water use efficiency 30-50%, because losses are very high 80-95%
Saving in labour Labour engaged per irrigation is higher than drip Labour required only for operation and periodic maintenance of the system
Weed infestation Weed infestation is very high Less wetting of soil, weed infestation is very less or almost nil.
Use of saline water Concentration of salts increases and adversely affects the plant growth. Saline water cannot be used for irrigation Frequent irrigation keeps the salt concentration within root zone below harmful level
Diseases and pest problems High Relatively less because of less atmospheric humidity
Suitability in different soil Type Deep percolation is more in light soil and with limited soil depths. Runoff loss is more in heavy soils Suitable for all soil types as flow rate can be controlled
Water control Inadequate Very precise and easy
Efficiency of fertilizer use Efficiency is low because of heavy losses due to leaching and runoff Very high due to reduced loss of nutrients through leaching and runoff water
Soil erosion Soil erosion is high because of large stream sizes used for irrigation. Partial wetting of soil surface and slow application rates eliminate any possibility of soil erosion
Increase in crop yield Non-uniformity in available moisture reducing the crop yield Frequent watering eliminates moisture stress and yield can be increased up to 15-150% as compared to conventional methods of irrigation
Source: Sivanappan, R.K. 1994. Prospects of Microirrigation in India,Irrigation and Drainage Systems. Vol. 8, pp. 49-58.
Narayanamoorthy, A. (1997). Drip Irrigation-A viable option for future irrigation development, Productivity, Vol.38, No 3, October-December1997.
 
 
Table 1.3 Theoretical Potential for Drip and Sprinkler Irrigation for Various Crops
 
 Crops Area (M ha)
Drip Sprinkler Total
Cereals - 27.6 27.6
Pulses - 7.6 7.6
Oil Seeds 3.8 1.1 4.9
Cotton 7.0 1.8 8.8
Vegetables 3.6 2.4 6.0
Spices and condiments 1.4 1.0 2.4
Flowers and Medicinal and aromatic plants - 1.0 1.0
Sugarcane 4.3 - 4.3
Fruits 3.9 - 3.9
Coconut & Plantation Crops, Oil Palm 3.0 - 3.0
Total 27.0 42.5 69.5
 Source: Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2003, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi
Horticulture Database 2002, National Horticultural Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, Gurgaon
 
1.2 Historical Development of Drip Irrigation
Drip irrigation was developed originally as a sub-irrigation system and this basic idea underlying drip irrigation can be traced back to experiments in Germany in 1860's. The first work in drip irrigation in the U.S.A was a study carried out by House in Colorado in 1913. An important breakthrough was made in Germany way back in 1920 when perforated pipe drip irrigation was introduced.

During the early 1940's Symcha Blass, an engineer from Israel, observed that a big tree near a leaking tap exhibited more vigorous growth than other trees in the area. This led him to the concept of an irrigation system that would apply water in small quantity literally drop by drop. Around 1948, greenhouse operators in the UK began to try a similar method with some modifications. The earliest drip irrigation system consisted of plastic capillary tubes of small diameter (1 mm) attached to 1arge pipes. One of the refinements made by Blass in his original system was coiled emitter. In the early 1960's, experiments in the Israel reported spectacular results when they applied the Blass system in the desert area of the Negev and Arava.
 
 
Drip irrigation pipes began to be sold outside Israel in 1969 on commercial basis. Drip irrigation unit in their current diverse forms were installed widely in U.S.A, Australia, Israel, Mexico and to a lesser extent in Canada, Cyprus, France, Iran, New Zealand, UK, Greece and India.

In India drip irrigation was practised through indigenous methods such as perforated earthenware pipes, perforated bamboo pipes and pitcher/porous cups. In Meghalaya some of the tribal farmers are using bamboo drip irrigation system for betel, pepper and arecanut crops by diverting hill streams in hill slopes. Earthenware pitchers and porous cups have been used for growing vegetable crops in Rajasthan and Haryana. In India drip irrigation was introduced in the early 70's at agricultural universities and other research institutions. The growth of drip irrigation has really gained momentum in the last one decade.

These developments have taken place mainly in areas of acute water scarcity and in commercial/horticultural crops, such as coconut, grapes, banana, fruit trees, sugarcane and plantation crops in the states of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Gujarat.

In 1981, the Government of India constituted National Committee on the Use of Plastics in Agriculture (NCPA) under the Ministry of Chemicals and Petrochemicals. Later NCPA was re-christened as National Committee on Plasticulture Applications in Horticulture (NCPAH) in 2001 in the Ministry of Agriculture under the Department of Agriculture & Cooperation with Hon’ble Minister of Agriculture as its Chairman.

The NCPAH has dedicated more than two decades in the development and promotion of plasticulture applications in the country, which included drip and sprinkler irrigation.

Since its inception, NCPAH made many recommendations to the Government. One of the recommendations was establishment of 17 Precision Farming Development Centres all over the country in various agro climatic zones to undertake development trials, demonstration of technologies and training of farmers and departmental officers and recommend package of practices on Plasticulture applications. Considering high cost of Plasticulture applications, on the recommendation of NCPAH, the Government of India started providing subsidy to farmers and other eligible beneficiaries for adoption of these applications.

Since then, GOI is providing subsidy to farmers for the plasticulture applications in water management (drip and sprinkler), greenhouse technology and plastic mulching and other Plasticulture applications. The subsidy is channelised through state directorate of horticulture/agriculture. The NCPAH is assisting the GOI in formulating the plan for horticultural development and implementing the subsidy schemes.
 
1.3 Microirrigation System
Microirrigation is frequent application of water directly on or below the soil surface near the root zone of plants. It delivers required and measured quantity of water in relatively small amounts slowly to the individual or groups of plants. Water is applied as continuous drops, tiny streams, or fine spray through emitters placed along a low-pressure delivery system. Such system provides water precisely to plant root zones and maintains ideal moisture conditions for plant growths.
The available literature and the results obtained at Precision Farming Development Centre, IIT Kharagpur and other research centres report that there is 50 to 70% saving in irrigation water and 18 to 152 % increase in yield of fruits and vegetable crops through drip irrigation. Table 1.4 shows the extent of water saving and increase in yield with drip irrigation system.
 
Table 1.4 Extent of Water Saving and Increase in Yield with Drip Irrigation Systems
 
Crops Water saving (%) Increase in yield (%)
Sugarcane 50 99
Tomato 42 60
>Watermelon 66 19
Cucumber 56 45
Chili 68 28
Cauliflower 68 70
Okra 37 33
Ground nut 40 152
Mulberry 22 23
Banana 45 52
Grapes 48 23
Sweet lime 61 50
Pomegranate 45 45
Source: INCID 1994 Drip irrigation in India, New Delhi.
NCPAH, 2001 Progress Report, Ministry of Agriculture Govt. of India, New Delhi.
 
1.3.1 Advantages of Microirrigation
  • Water saving
  • Enhanced plant growth and yield
 
 
  • Uniform and better quality of produce
  • Efficient and economic use of fertilizers
  • Less weed growth
  • Also suitable to waste lands
  • Possibility of using saline water
  • No soil erosion
  • Flexibility in operation
  • Easy installation
  • Labour saving
  • Suitable to all types of land terrain
  • xiii) Saves land as no bunds etc. are required
  • Minimum diseases and pest infestation
 
1.3.2 Types of Microirrigation System
The basic types of microirrigation system are as follows:
Surface System
It is the system in which emitters and laterals are laid on the ground surface along the rows of crops. The emitting devices are located in the root zone area of trees.

Sub-surface System

It is a system in which water is applied slowly below the land surface through emitters. Such systems are generally preferred in semi permanent/permanent installations.
Bubbler system
In this system the water is applied to the soil surface in a small stream or fountain. Bubbler systems do not require elaborate filtration systems. These are suitable in situations where large amount of water need to be applied in a short period of time and suitable for irrigating trees with wide root zones and high water requirements.
 
Micro and mini Sprinklers
These are small plastic sprinklers with rotating spinners. The spinners rotate with water pressure and sprinkle the water. These are available in different discharges and diameters of coverage and can operate at low pressure in the range of 1.0 to 2kg/cm2. Water is given only to the root zone area as in the case of drip irrigation but not to the entire ground surface as done in the case of sprinkler irrigation method.
 
 
Pulse
Pulse system uses high discharge rate emitters and consequently has short water application time. The primary advantage of this system is a possible reduction in the clogging problem.
 
Biwall
It is extruded dual chamber micro-irrigation tubing manufactured from Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE). This system is suitable for all closely spaced row crops like sugarcane, cotton, vegetables, onion, tea etc.
1.3.3
 
Microirrigation Components
Fig. 1.1 shows the Microirrigation system with different components .The components of Microirrigation system can be grouped into two major groups viz.
  • Head control unit and
  • Distribution network
 
Head Control Unit
The head control unit of Microirrigation System includes the following components.
  • Pump/Overhead Tank: It is required to provide sufficient pressure in the system. Centrifugal pumps are generally used for low pressure trickle systems. Overhead tanks can be used for small areas or orchard crops with comparatively lesser water requirements.
  • Fertilizer Applicator: Application of fertilizer into pressurized irrigation system is done by either a by-pass pressure tank, or by venturi injector or direct injection system. The detailed description of fertilizer application system is presented in subsequent section s(1.6.2).
 
 
  • Filters: The hazard of blocking or clogging necessitates the use of filters for efficient and trouble free operation of the microirrigation system. The different types of filters used in microirrigation system are described below.
Fig. 1.1 Components of Microirrigation System
 
a) Gravel or Media Filter: Media filters consist of fine gravel or coarse quartz sand, of selected sizes (usually 1.5 – 4 mm in diameter) free of calcium carbonate placed in a cylindrical tank. These filters are effective in removing light suspended materials, such as algae and other organic materials, fine sand and silt particles. This type of filtration is essential for primary filtration of irrigation water from open water reservoirs, canals or reservoirs in which algae may develop. Water is introduced at the top, while a layer of coarse gravel is put near the outlet bottom. Reversing the direction of flow and opening the water drainage valve cleans the filter. Pressure gauges are placed at the inlet and at the outlet ends of the filter to measure the head loss across the filter. If the head loss exceeds more than 30 kPa, filter needs back washing. Fig. 1.2 shows different types of media filters.
 
 
Fig. 1.2 Different types of Media filters
 
b) Screen Filters: Screen filters are always installed for final filtration as an additional safeguard against clogging. While majority of impurities are filtered by sand filter, minute sand particles and other small impurities pass through it. The screen filter, containing screen strainer, which filters physical impurities and allows only clean water to enter into the micro irrigation system (Fig. 1.3). The screens are usually cylindrical and made of non-corrosive metal or plastic material. These are available in a wide variety of types and flow rate capacities with screen sizes ranging from 20 mesh to 200 mesh. The aperture size of the screen opening should be between one seventh and one tenth of the orifice size of emission devices used.
Fig.1.3 Screen filter showing steel wire mesh strainers
 
 
c) Centrifugal Filters: Centrifugal filters are effective in filtering sand, fine gravel and other high density materials from well or river water. Water is introduced tangentially at the top of a cone and creates a circular motion resulting in a centrifugal force, which throws the heavy suspended particles against the walls. The separated particles are collected in the narrow collecting vessel at the bottom. Fig.1.4 shows different types hydro cyclone/centrifugal filters.
Fig.1.4 Hydro cyclone filter
 
d) Disk Filters: Disk filter (Fig. 1.5) contains stacks of grooved, ring shaped disks that capture debris and are very effective in the filtration of organic material and algae. During the filtration mode, the disks are pressed together. There is an angle in the alignment of two adjacent disks, resulting in cavities of varying size and partly turbulent flow. The sizes of the groove determine the filtration grade. Disk filters are available in a wide size range (25-400 microns). Back flushing can clean disk filters. However they require back flushing pressure as high as 2 to 3 kg/cm2.
Fig.1.5 Disk filter showing stacks of discs
 
 
4. Pressure relief valves, regulators or bye pass arrangement: These valves may be installed at any point where possibility exists for excessively high pressures, either static or surge pressures to occur. A bye pass arrangement is simplest and cost effective means to avoid problems of high pressures instead of using costly pressure relief valves.
 
5. Check valves or non-return valves: These valves are used to prevent unwanted flow reversal. They are used to prevent damaging back flow from the system to avoid return flow of chemicals and fertilizers from the system into the water source itself to avoid contamination of water source.
 
Distribution Network:
It mainly constitutes main line, submains line and laterals with drippers and other accessories.
 
1. Mainline
The mainline transports water within the field and distribute to submains. Mainline is made of rigid PVC and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Pipelines of 65 mm diameter and above with a pressure rating 4 to 6 kg/cm2 are used for main pipes..
 
2. Submains
Submains distribute water evenly to a number of lateral lines. For sub main pipes, rigid PVC, HDPE or LDPE (Low Density Polyethylene) of diameter ranging from 32 mm to 75 mm having pressure rating of 2.5 kg/cm2 are used.
 
3. Laterals
Laterals distribute the water uniformly along their length by means of drippers or emitters. These are normally manufactured from LDPE and LLDPE. Generally pipes having 10, 12 and 16 mm internal diameter with wall thickness varying from 1 to 3 mm are used as laterals.
 
4. Emitters / Drippers
They function as energy dissipaters, reducing the inlet pressure head (0.5 to 1.5 atmospheres) to zero atmospheres at the outlet. The commonly used drippers are online pressure compensating or online non-pressure compensating, in-line dripper, adjustable discharge type drippers, vortex type drippers and micro tubing of 1 to 4 mm diameter. These are manufactured from Poly- propylene or LLDPE.
 
 
A) Online Pressure Compensating drippers: A pressure compensating type dripper supplies water uniformly on long rows and on uneven slopes. These are manufactured with high quality flexible rubber diaphragm or disc inside the emitter that it changes shape according to operating pressure and delivers uniform discharge. These are most suitable on slopes and difficult topographic terrains.
 
B) Online Non-Pressure Compensating drippers: In such type of drippers discharge tends to vary with operating pressure. They have simple thread type, labyrinth type, zigzag path, vortex type flow path or have float type arrangement to dissipate energy. However they are cheap and available in affordable price.
 
C) In-Line Drippers or Inline tubes: These are fixed along with the line, i.e., the pipe is cut and dripper is fixed in between the cut ends, such that it makes a continuous row after fixing the dripper. They have generally a simple thread type or labyrinth type flow path. Such types of drippers are suitable for row crops.
Inline tubes are available which include inline tube with cylindrical dripper, inline tubes with patch drippers, or porous tapes or biwall tubes. They are provided with independent
 
 
pressure compensating water discharge mechanism and extremely wide water passage to prevent clogging.
Other accessories are take-out/starter, rubber grommet, end plug, joints, tees, manifolds etc.
 
1.4 Selection of Microirrigation emission devices for different crops under different soil texture
Emission devices are selected based on the crop water requirement and soil texture. The number and types of emission devices for different crops are given in the Table 1.5.
 
1.5. Planning and Design of Drip Irrigation System
The planning and design of drip irrigation system is essential to supply the required amount of irrigation water. The water requirement of the plant per day depends on the water that is taken by the plant from the soil and the amount of water evaporating from the soil in the immediate vicinity of the root zone in a day. The plant intake is affected by the leaf area, stage of growth, climate, soil conditions etc. The water requirement and irrigation schedule can be determined from the soil or plant indicators based methods or soil water budget method, but the simplest and most commonly method is to use pan evaporimeter data. To apply the required amount of water uniformly to all the plants in the field, it is essential to design the system to maintain desired hydraulic pressure in the pipe network. The design of Microirrigation system is essentially a decision regarding selection of emitters, laterals and manifolds, sub main, main pipeline and required pumping unit. The steps needed to be followed for designing the Microirrigation system are given below:
  • Collection of general information
  • Layout of the field
  • Crop water requirement
  • Hydraulic design of the system
  • Pump horse power requirement
 
 
Table 1.5 Recommended numbers and discharge of drippers/ micro jets/micro sprinklers for different crops, spacings and soil type.
 
Crops Spacing Row & plant (ft) Dripper per plant x Discharge (Lph) Micro Jet per plant x Pattern x Discharge Micro Sprinkler ** PWR
Loamy  sand Clay loam Clay
Grapes 6x6 2x4 2x4 2x4 1 x HC x LD One for Four plants 14
  8x8 2x4 2x4 2x4 1 x FC x LD One for Four plants 16
  10x10 2x4 2x4 2x4 1 x FC x LD One for Four plants 14
Pomegranate 12x12 3x4 3x4 3x4 1 x FC x LD One for Four plants 24
  15x15 4x4 4x4 3x4 2 x HC x LD One for Four plants 40
Guava 15x15 4x4 4x4 3x4 2 x HC x LD One for Four plants 50
  18x18 4x8 4x4 4x4 2 x HC x LD One per plant 60
Apple 15x15 4x4 4x4 3x4 2 x HC x LD One for Four plants 40
Orange 18x18 4x8 4x8 4x4 2 x HC x LD One per plant 60
lemon 20x20 4x8 4x8 4x8 2 x FC x LD One per plant 80
Mango 20x20 4x8 4x8 4x8 2 x FC x LD One per plant 120
  25x25 4x8 4x8 4x8 2 x FC x LD Two per plant 130
Banana 5x5 1x4 1x4 1x4 1 x FC x LD One for Four plants 16
  10x10 2x8 2x4 2x4 1 x FC x LD One for Four plants 20
Papaya 7x7 2x4 2x4 1x4 1 x HC x LD One for Four plants 20
Coconut 20x20 4x4 4x4 4x4 2 x FC x LD One per plant 80
  25x25 4x8 4x8 4x8 2 x FC x HD One per plant 100
 Pattern : HC- Half Circle. FC - Full Circle, LD - Low Discharge, HD - High Discharge
**PWR : Peak Water Requirement in litre per day per plant.
Source : Anonymous (2002) Applied Design Manual Microirrigation System, Jain Irrigation Systems Limited, Jalgaon.
 
i) Collection of General Information
General information on water source, crops to be grown, topographic condition, type and texture of the soil and climatic data are essential for the design of the Microirrigation system.
ii) Layout of the Field
 
 
Based on the available data of water capacity, water requirement of the plant, pressure required at the lateral, etc., layout designs are made by taking case of head loss, the layout design can be made as shown in Fig 1.6
Fig. 1.6 Different drip irrigation system layout designs
 
iii) Crop Water Requirement
The daily crop water requirement is estimated by using the equation
 
 
Net daily volume of water required
Daily operating hours of the system (T) =  
Where
 
=
Volume of water required in liter (L day-1)
 
=
Mean pan evaporation for the month in mm day-1
 
=
Crop coefficient
 
=
Pan coefficient
 
=
Plant to plant x Row to row spacing (m2)
 
=
Effective rainfall (mm)
 
=
Wetting fraction (varies from 0.3 to 1.0)
N
 
=
Number of emitters per plant
N
 
=
Number of plants
q
 
=
Emitter discharge (Lh-1)
The crop coefficient (K)varies with crop growth stage and season. The crop coefficient (Kc) is considered for development of crop for design of microirrigation system.
 
iv) Hydraulic Design of System
The ideal micro-irrigation system is one in which all emitters (orifices) deliver the same volume of water in a given time. From the practical point of view, it is almost impossible to achieve this ideal performance. However, the flow variation of water pressure can be controlled by the hydraulic design.
 
Flow carried by each lateral line
= Discharge of one dripper ? No. of drippers per lateral
Flow carried by each sub main line
= x No. of lateral lines per sub main
Flow carried by main line = x No. of sub main line
 
The size of mains, sub mains, laterals and pump are decided based on the desired flow rate and pressure head in the system. The pressure drop due to friction can be generally evaluated with the help of William Hazen or Dacy-Weishbach equation. The procedure for
 
 
computation of head loss in lateral, sub main, main pipes and horsepower requirement of pump are given in this section.

Head Loss in Laterals
The pipes used in micro-irrigation system are made of plastics and considered as smooth pipe. The pressure drop due to friction can be evaluated with the help of Hazen -William empirical equation as given below.
As the length of the pipe increases, the discharge in the pipe decreases due to emission outlets and hence the total energy drop is less than as given by the above equation. For this reason, a reduction factor F is introduced
Where,

H (100) = head loss due to friction per 100 meter of pipe length, m/100m
Q = flow of water in pipe, lps
D = Internal diameter of pipe, cm
L = length of the pipe, m
C = Hazen - William constant (140 for PVC pipe)
F= Reduction Factor due to multiple openings in pipe, which can be computed by equation.
  = 1.852
  = number of outlets on the lateral
 
The design criteria for lateral pipe are to keep pressure variation and discharge variation within the prescribed limit. For lateral design, the discharge and operating pressure at the emitter are required to be known. Based on this, the allowable head loss can be calculated using above formula. The diameter of lateral pipe is usually selected such that the difference in discharge between emitter operating simultaneously will not exceed 10%. Pressure head difference should not exceed 10 to 15% of the operating pressure. For the discharge variation of 10%, the emission uniformity has to be more than 90%.
 
Head Loss in Submains
The submains line hydraulics is similar to that of the lateral hydraulics. The sub main hydraulics characteristics can be computed by assuming the laterals are analogous to emitters
 
 
on lateral line. Hydraulics characteristics of sub main and main line pipe are usually taken hydraulically smooth since PVC and HDPE pipe are normally used. The Hazen Williams roughness coefficient is usually taken between 140 and 150. The energy loss in the sub main can be computed with the methods similar to those used for lateral computations.
 
Head Loss in Main Line
Usually the pressure controls or adjustments are provided at the sub main inlet. Therefore energy losses in the main line should not affect system uniformity. There is no outlet in case of main line therefore reduction factor is not multiplied. The frictional head loss in main pipeline is calculated by the same Darcy-Weisbach formula or Hazen-Williams formula.
 
v) Horsepower requirement of pump
The horsepower requirement of pump is computed by using flowing equation.
Horsepower required (hp) =  
Where,
 
=
Total pumping head (H + H + H), m
Hf 
 
=
Total head loss due to friction (Friction head loss in mains + Friction head loss in sub mains + Friction loss in laterals + Head loss in accessories), m
He 
 
=
Operating pressure head required at the dripper, m
HS  
 
=
Total static head, m
Qm
 
=
Discharge of main, lps
np
 
=
Efficiency of pump, fraction
nm
 
=
Efficiency of motor, fraction
 
Example 1 Design a drip irrigation system for a citrus orchard of 1 ha area with length and breadth of 100 m each. Citrus has been planted at a spacing of 5 m ? 5.5 m. The maximum pan evaporation during summer is 8 mm/day. The other relevant data are given below:
Land slope
 
=
0.40 % upward slope from S – N direction
Water source
 
=
A well located at the S–W corner of the field
soil texture
 
=
Sandy loam
Clay content
 
=
18.4 %
Silt
 
=
22.6 %
Sand
 
=
59.0 %
Field capacity
 
=
14.9 %
Wilting point
 
=
8 %
Bulk density
 
=
1.44 g/cc
 
 
Effective root zone depth
 
=
120 cm
Wetting Percentage
 
=
40 %
Pan coefficient
 
=
0.7
Crop coefficient
 
=
0.8
 
Solution:
Step 1.
Estimation of water requirement
Evapotranspiration of the crop
 
=
Open pan evaporation ? Pan coefficient x Crop coefficient
 
=
8 x 0.7 x 0.8
 
=
4.48 mm/day
Volume of water to be applied
 
=
Area covered by each plant ? Wetting fraction x Evapotranspiration of the crop
   
=
(5 x 5.5) x 0.40 ? 4.48
   
=
49.28 l/day or 50 l/day
 
Step 2.
Emitter selection and irrigation time
Emitters are selected based on the soil texture and crop root zone system. Assuming three emitters of 4 lph, placed on each plant in a triangular pattern are sufficient so as to wet the effective root zone of the crop.
Total discharge delivered in one hour = 4 x 3 = 12 lph
Irrigation time = 50 / 12 = 4 h 10 minutes
 
Step 3.
Discharge through each lateral
A well is located at one corner of the field. Submains will be laid from the centre of field (Fig 1.7). Therefore, the length of main, submains, and lateral will be 50 m, 97.25 m, 47.5 m each respectively. The laterals will extend on both sides of the submains. Each lateral will supply water to 10 citrus plants.
Total number of laterals = (100/5.5) x 2 = 36.36 (Considering only 36)
Discharge carried by each lateral, Qlateral = 10 x 3 x 4 = 120 lph
Total discharge carried by 36 laterals = 120 x 36 = 4320 lph
Each plant is provided with three emitters, therefore total number of emitters will be 36 x 10 x 3 =1080
 
 
Step 4.
Determination of number of manifolds
Assuming the pump discharge = 2.5 lps = 9000 lph
Number of laterals that can be operated by each manifold = 9000/120 = 75
So only one manifold or submains can supply water to all the laterals at a time.
 
Step 5.
Size of lateral
Once the discharge carried by each lateral is known, then size of the lateral can be determined by using the Hazen- Williams equation (7)
The reduction factor (F) can be estimated as
=
= 0.54 m
Hf= 0.54 ? (47.5/100) = 0.26 m
For D = 16 mm, = 0.063 m
The permissible head loss due to friction is 10% of head of 10 m (head required to operate 4 lph emitters) is 1 m, therefore 12 mm dia lateral size is selected.
 
Step 6.
Size of submain
Total discharge through the submain
 
=
Qlateral x Number of laterals
 
=
120 x 36
 
=
4320 lph = 1.2 lps
Assuming the diameter of the submain as 50 mm. The values of parameter of the Hazen- Williams equation are
 
=
150
 
=
1.2 lps
 
=
50 mm
 
 
 
=
1.22 x 101
 
=
0.364
= 0.31 m
 
for 97.25 m of pipe length = 0.31 ? (97.25/100) = 0.30 m
Therefore, frictional head loss in the submain = 0.30 m
Head at the inlet of the submain = Hemitter + H lateral + H submain + Hslope
= 10 + 0.26 + 0.30 + 0.40 = 10.96 m
Pressure head variation =
= 6.38 %
 
Estimated head loss due to friction in the submain is much less than the recommended 20% variation, hence reducing the pipe size from 50 to 35 mm will probably be a good option.
= 1.75 m
 
for 97.25 m pipe = 1.75 ? (97.25/100) = 1.70 m
Head at the inlet of the submain = Hemitter + H lateral + Hsubmain + Hslope
= 10 + 0.26 + 1.70 + 0.40 = 12.36 m
Pressure head variation =
= 17%
 
Step 7.
Size of the main line
Assuming the diameter of main as 50 mm
Discharge of main, Qmain = Discharge of submain, Qsubmain
The values of parameter of the Hazen- Williams equation are
=
150
=
1.2 lps
=
50 mm
=
1.22 x 1012
 
 
=
= 0.84 m
for 50 m main pipe = 0.84 ? (50/100) = 0.42 m
 
Step 8.
Determining the horse power of pump
Assume head variation due to uneven field variations and the losses due to pump fittings, etc. as 10 % of all other losses.
Hlocal = 10 % of all other loss
Total dynamic head
 
=
( Hemitter + H lateral + H submain + H main+ Hslope ) + Hstatic + Hlocal
 
=
12.36 + 0.42 +10 +1.28
 
=
24.06 m
Pump Horse power
where,
=
total dynamic head, m
=
total discharge through main line, lps
=
efficiency of pump
= 0.64 = 1.0
Hence 1 hp pump is adequate for operating the drip irrigation system to irrigate for 1 ha area of citrus crop.
 
The design details of components microirrigation system are estiamted as
Length of laterals = 47.5 m Number of laterals = 36
Diameter of lateral = 12 mm Length of submain = 97.25 m
Number of submain = 1 Diameter of submain = 35 mm
Length of main = 50 m Number of main = 1
Diameter of main = 50 mm Total power required = 1 hp
 
 
Figure.1.7 Layout of drip irrigation system
 
1.6 Application of Fertilizers and other Agro Chemicals (Fertigation and Chemigation)
Fertigation is the method of application of soluble fertilizer with irrigation water. Fertigation is a prerequisite for drip irrigation. Since the wetted soil volume is limited, the root system is confined and concentrated. The nutrients from the root zone are depleted quickly and a continuous application of nutrients along with the irrigation water is necessary for adequate plant growth. Fertigation offers precise control on fertilizer application and can be adjusted to the rate of plant nutrient uptake.
 
1.6.1 Advantages of Fertigation
Several distinct advantages of fertigation in comparison with conventional application methods are as follows:
i) The supply of nutrients can be more carefully regulated and monitored.
ii) The nutrients can be distributed more evenly throughout the entire root zone or soil profile.
iii) The nutrients can be supplied incrementally throughout the season to meet the actual nutritional requirements of the crop.
iv) Nutrients can be applied to the soil when crop or soil conditions would otherwise prohibit entry into the field with conventional equipment.
v) Soil compaction is avoided, as heavy equipment never enters the field.
vi) Crop damage by root pruning, breakage of leaves, or bending over is avoided, as it occurs with conventional chemical field application techniques.
vii) Less equipment may be required to apply the chemicals and fertilizers.
 
 
viii) Less energy is required in applying the chemical. Usually less labor is needed to supervise the application.
 
All chemicals applied through irrigation systems must meet the following criteria.
a) Avoid corrosion, softening of plastic pipe and tubing, or clogging of any component of the system.
b) Safe for field use.
c) Soluble or emulsifiable in water.
d) Should not react adversely to salts or other chemicals in the irrigation water.
 
The commonly applied solid fertilizers used their nutrient content; solubility and compatibility are given in Table 1.6
 
Table 1.6 Fertilizers Suitable for Fertigation
 
Name Chemical form N-P2O5-K2O Content (%) Solubility (g/l at 200C) Remarks
Ammonium Nitrate/td> NH4NO3 34-0-0 1830 Incompatible with acids
Ammonium Sulfate (NH4)2SO4 21-0-0

760

Clogging with hard water

Urea

CO(NH2)2

46-0-0

1100

 

Diammonium Phosphate

(NH4)2HP2O5

18-46-0

575

Contains phosphorous at high solubility

Potassium Chloride

KCl

0-0-60

347

Chloride toxic for some crops, Cheapest K source

Potassium Nitrate

KNO3

13-0-44

316

Expensive, high Nitrate

Potassium Sulfate

K2SO4

0-0-50

110

Excellent source of sulfur, clogging with hard water.

Phosphoric acid

H3PO4

0-52-0

457

Incompatible with Calcium

 
 
1.6.2 Equipment and Methods for Fertilizer Injection: Injection of fertilizer and other agrochemicals such as herbicides and pesticides into the drip irrigation system is done by i) By-pass pressure tank ii) Venturi system and iii) Direct injection system.
 
1).By-pass pressure tank: This method employs a tank into which the dry or liquid fertilizers kept. The tank is connected to the main irrigation line by means of a by-pass so that some of the irrigation water flows through the tank and dilutes the fertilizer solution. This by-pass flow is brought about by a pressure gradient between the entrance and exit of the tank, created by a permanent constriction in the line or by a control valve.
 
 
2).Venturi Injector: A constriction in the main water flow pipe increases the water flow velocity thereby causing a pressure differential (vacuum) which is sufficient to suck fertilizer solution from an open reservoir into the water stream. The rate of injection can be regulated by means of valves. This is a simple and relatively inexpensive method of fertilizer application.
 
 
3). Direct injection system: With this method a pump is used to inject fertilizer solution into the irrigation line. The type of pump used is dependent on the power source. The pump may be driven by an internal combustion engine, an electric motor or hydraulic pressure. The electric pump can be automatically controlled and is thus the most convenient to use. However its use is limited by the availability of electrical power. The use of a hydraulic pump, driven by the water pressure of the irrigation system, avoids this limitation. The injection rate of fertilizer solution is proportional to the flow of water in the system. A high degree of control over the injection rate is possible, no serious head loss occurs and operating cost is low. Another advantage of using hydraulic pump for fertigation is that if the flow of water stops in the irrigation system, fertilizer injection also automatically stops. This is the most perfect equipment for accurate fertigation.
Two injection points should be provided, one before and one after the filter for fertigation. This arrangement helps in by-passing the filter if filtering is not required and thus avoids corrosion damage to the valves, filters and filter-screens or to the sand media of sand filters.
The capacity of the injection system depends on the concentration, rate and frequency of application of fertilizer solution.
 
 
Calculation of fertilizer application
The amount of fertilizer to be applied per application (P) is given by
p =
 
Where,
F
=
fertilizer requirement, kg/ha
N
=
area of the field, ha,
A
=
number of applications.
 
Amount of fertilizer compound per application:
The ratio of N, P and K in fertilizer compounds varies with different fertilizers components. If the nitrogen content of a given fertilizer is X per cent, the actual amount of fertilizer A (kg of compound per application) to be applied per application is
A = (P/X) 100
 
Rate of fertilizer injection
The rate of injection of fertilizer solution into the system qc in l/h can be calculated according to the following equation
qc = FrA/ctrT
where F1 is the fertilizer application rate per irrigation (kg/ha), A is the area irrigated (ha), c is the concentration of the fertilizer solution (kg/l), T is the duration of irrigation (h) and tr is the ratio between fertilizing time and irrigation time.
 
Example 2
If a total 120 kg of N, 60 kg of P and 60 kg of K is to be applied in an area of 1 hectare in 20 applications, the amount of fertiliser to be applied during each application, P (kg/application) :
 
Part I
30 kg N: 30 kg P: 30 kg in 10 applications
Compound Fertilizers have N, P and K percentage in the ratio of 8: 8: 8.
So N (30x1/10) and P (30x1/10) and K (30x1/10) = 3 kg/application of N, 3 kg /application of P and 3 kg/application of K.
 
 
The amount of fertilizer compound to be applied per application, T
= (3 x 100) / 8 = 37 .5 kg / application
So 375 kg of fertilizer in 10 applications
Part II
90 kg N : 30 kg P : 30 kg K in 10 applications.
Compound Fertilizer (Liquid) having N, P and K percentage in the ratio of 15:5:5
So (90 x 1) / 10 of N, kg/application
= 9 kg/application
The amount of fertilizer compound to be applied per application T.
= (9/15)100
= 60 kg/application
So, 600 kg of liquid fertilizer (15:5:5) in 10 applications.
 
Example 3 A drip irrigation system is installed in 2 ha area under citrus crop. The plants are spaced at 5 m ? 5.5 m apart. Urea – ammonium nitrate, a liquid fertilizer with 32% nitrogen and weighing 1.32 kg/l is available for fertigation. Find the fertilizer injection rate to apply 60 kg/ha of elemental nitrogen. The irrigation and fertilizing time are 10 h and 5 h respectively.
 
Solution:
Irrigation application time (T) = 10 h, Fertilizing time = 5 h,
The ratio of fertilizing time and irrigation application time ( ) = 0.5
The concentration of elemental nitrogen, N, in the liquid fertilizer
= 1.32 X 32/100 = 0.42 kg/l
Using the above equation (11), the injection rate
= 57.14 l/h
 
1.7 Installation of Microirrigation System
Installation of microirrigation system include following steps
i) Installation of pumping unit
ii) Installation of fertigation unit.
iii) Fitting of filter unit
iv) Laying of mains and submains
v) Laying of lateral and connecting emitters
 
 
i) Installation of pumping unit: Generally centrifugal pump is used in microirrigation system. The centrifugal pump is installed as close to the water surface as possible. It is located at an easily accessible place in clean, dry and well ventilated surroundings. To ensure maximum capacity, the site selected should permit the use of the shortest and most direct suction and discharge pipes. The foundation should be rigid enough to absorb all vibrations. The pump and driver must be carefully aligned. The suction piping should be as direct and short as possible. It should have minimum of fittings so as to avoid excessive friction losses. The use of bends, elbows, tees and other fittings is kept to the minimum to reduce head loss in the discharge line.
 
ii) Installation of fertigation unit: Water soluble fertilizer/chemical is injected into microirrigation system through fertilizer tanks, venturi type meter or injection pumps. The fertilizer tank/venturi injector or injection pump is connected parallel to the irrigation pipe line by creating differential pressure. Non-return valve is installed to prevent contamination of water source.
 
iii) Installation of Filter Unit: The following points should be considered for fixing the position of filter unit.
a) Minimum use of fitting such as elbows and bends to be made.
b) The filter unit should be fixed on the delivery side of the pump.
c) Care should be taken to see that the filter size should be in accordance with the capacity of the system.
 
iv) Installation of Mains and Sub mains: Except for fully portable system, both mains and sub mains are installed underground at a minimum depth of about 0.5 m such that they are unaffected by cultivation or by heavy harvesting machinery. Even for systems, which have portable laterals that are removed at the end of each season, it is common practice to install permanent underground sub mains. Generally sub mains run across the direction of the rows.
 
v) Laying of Laterals: Generally laterals are laid on the ground surface. Usually laterals are placed along contours on sloping field. Burying laterals underground might be necessary or at least have some advantages for some installations. Where this is done, the emission devices should be above ground level. The downstream end of the lateral can be closed by simply folding back the pipe and closing it with a ring of larger diameter pipe, known as end plug. This can be easily slipped for flushing. The simplest connection for low-pressure system is for the lateral to be inserted directly into the sub main. Slightly undersized hole in the sub main is cut with the help of twist meter drill bit. The hole is expanded with the
 
 
tapered tool, and then the lateral is inserted quickly after withdrawing the taper. The lateral is cut at an angle of about 450 at the end.
 
vi) Punching of Laterals and Fixing of Drippers
a) Water is passed through the laterals and flushed so that it gets bulged and makes easy for punching.
b) The holes on the lateral are made as per the required spacing.
c) The dripper position should be fixed according to design, soil water report and water requirement in peak summer.
d) Punching should be done from the sub main.
e) While fixing the dripper, the dripper should be pushed inside the lateral and pulled slightly to ensure leak proof connection.
f) The end of lateral should be closed with end cap.
 
1.8 Testing of the Microirrigation System
After installing the system, its testing should be done in the following way:
a) Backwash the filter till clean water comes out through its flush valve.
b) See that all the gate valves and flush valves are opened before testing.
c) Close the flush valve after the sub main is completely flushed.
d) When the laterals are completely flushed, close with the help of end caps.
e) Check the pressure on the gauges installed at inlet and outlet of the filter.
f) Obtain the desired pressure at the filter, if excess pressure is observed open the bypass valve slowly till the desired pressure is obtained.
g) Check the working of air release valve at the submains.
h) At this pressure, measure the discharge at a minimum of three places( first, middle and last dripper of lateral) by volumetric method.
i) The emission uniformity of microirrigation system can be estimated by using following formula.
j) Modify the design/ change drippers, if the Emission Uniformity is less than 85 %.
 
Where,
EU
=
Emission Uniformity, percent
qn  
=
Average of lowest ¼ of emitter flow rate, l/h
qavr
=
Average emitter flow rate, l/h
 
 
Example 4 Estimate the emission uniformity (EU) of emitters for a drip irrigation sub-main unit with the following field data. Given time (sec) required to fill a 100 ml container from 24 individual emitters are 64, 79, 67, 71,75, 81,68,85,75,69,85, 77,89,68,81,90,65,61, 72,78,80,70,74 and 68
Solution:
Individual emitter discharges (ml/s):
1.56,1.27,1.49,1.41,1.33,1.23,1.47,1.18,1.33,1.45,1.18,1.30,1.12,1.47,1.23, 1.11, 1.54, 1.64, 1.39, 1.28, 1.25, 1.43, 1.35 and 1.47
 
Average of lowest ¼ th of emitter flow rate (ml/s):
= (1.11+1.12++1.18+1.18+1.23+1.23)/6 = 1.176

Average emitter flow rate (ml/s) = 1.35
Emission uniformity = (1.176/1.35) x 100 = 86.87 %
Hence emission uniformity is within the prescribed limit.
 
1.9 Maintenance and remedies for troubleshooting in Microirrigation System
Periodic preventive maintenance is required for successful operation of Microirrigation system (Fig. 1.8).
 
1.9.1 General Maintenance
Filter is the heart of a drip system and its failure will lead to clogging of the entire system. Pressure differential across the filter is the correct indication of the timing of cleaning of the filter.
 
A) Sand Filter
i) Backwash the filter daily for five minutes to remove the silt and other dirt accumulated during the previous day’s irrigation.
ii) Do not allow pressure difference across the sand filter more than 0.3 kg/cm2.
iii) Once in a week, while backwashing, allow the backwash water to pass through the lid instead of the backwash valves.
 
 
iv) Stir the sand in the filter bed up to the filter candles without damaging them. Whatever dirt is accumulated deep inside the sand bed will get free and goes out with the water through the lid.
 
B) Screen Filter
i) Clean screen filter everyday
ii) Open the flushing valve on the filter lid so that the dirt and silt will be flushed out.
iii) Open the filter and take out the filter element and clean them from both sides. Care should be taken while replacing the rubber seals, otherwise they may get damaged.
iv) Do not allow pressure difference across the screen filter more than 0.2 kg/cm2.
v) Never use hard brush to rub screen surface.
 
1.9.3 Sub-main and Lateral / Bi-wall Flushing
Sometimes silt escapes through the filters and settles in sub mains and laterals. Also some algae and bacteria lead to the formation of slimes/pastes in the pipe and laterals. To remove them, the sub mains should be flushed by opening the flush valves. The lateral lines are flushed by removing the end caps. By flushing, even the traces of accumulated salts will also be removed. The flushing is stopped once the water going out is cleaned.
 
1.9.4 Chemical Treatment
Clogging or plugging of emitters/orifices of bi-wall will be due to precipitation and accumulation of certain dissolved salts like carbonates, bi-carbonates, iron, calcium and manganese salts. The clogging is also due to the presence of microorganisms and the related iron and sulphur slimes due to algae and bacteria.
The clogging or plugging is usually avoided / cleared by chemical treatment of water. Chemical treatment commonly used in micro-irrigation systems includes addition of chloride and/or acid to the water supply. The frequency of chemical treatment depends on degree of problem at the site. As a general rule, acid treatment should be performed once in ten days and chlorine treatment once in fifteen days.
 
a) Acid Treatment: Hydrochloric acid is injected into drip system at the rates suggested in the water analysis report. The acid treatment is performed till a pH of 4 is observed at the end of lateral length. After achieving a pH of 4 the system is shut off for 24 h. Next day the system is flushed by opening the flush valve and lateral end caps.
 
b) Chlorine Treatment: Chlorine treatment in the form of bleaching powder is performed to inhibit the growth of microorganism like algae and bacteria. The bleaching powder is dissolved in water and this solution is injected into the system for about 30 minutes. Then
 
 
the system is shut off for 24 hours. After that the lateral end caps and flush valves are opened to flush out the water with impurities. The bleaching powder can directly be injected through venturi at the rate of 2 mg/l.
 
 
Table 1.7 Drip irrigation system troubleshooting
 
Sl. No. Problems Causes Remedies
  Water not flowing up to lateral end  Holes in laterals. Cuts in laterals. Bents in laterals.
Close the holes and cuts. Remove the bends.
4. Out coming of white mixture on removing the end plug More salinity in water. Uncleaned lateral
Remove the end stop. Clean the laterals fortnightly
5. Under flow or over flow from laterals Clogging of drippers. Unclosed end plug
Clean the sand and screen filters. Close the end cap
6. Oily gum material comes out on opening the lateral end More algae or ferrous material in water Clean the laterals with water or give chemical treatment
7. Oily gum material comes out on opening the lateral end More algae or ferrous material in water Clean the laterals with water or give chemical treatment
8. More pressure drop in filters Accumulation of dirt infilters Clean filters every week. Back wash the filters forevery 5 minutes daily.
9. Pressure gauge not working Rain water entry inside. Corrosion in gauge pointer damage Provide plastic cover and fix  pointer properly.
10. Drop in pressure Leakage in main opened outlet. Low water level in well. Arrest the leakage and close outlet. Lower the pump with reference to well water level
11 More pressure at the entry of sand filter No bypass in the pipeline/bypass not opened. Displacement of filter element. Less quantity of sand in filters Provide bypass before filter and regulate pressure. Place filter element properly. Fill required quantity of sand
12. Accumulation of sand and debris in screen filter Displacement of filter element. Less quantity of sand in filters Place filter element properly. Fill required quantity of sand
13. Ventury not working during chemical treatment and fertigation Excess pressure on filters Improper fitting of ventury assembly Bypass extra water to reduce pressure Repair the ventury assembly.
14. Leakage of water from air release valve. Damaged air release valve ring. Replace the damaged ring.
 
 
1.10 Cost of drip irrigation system:
The cost of drip system depends on the type of crop, spacing, water requirement, proximity to water source etc. The cost estimation has been done for installing drip irrigation system for few important crops by considering the cost of components supplied by the manufacturer for the land holdings of one acre( 0.4 ha). The cost estimation for installation of drip system for Coconut, Aonla, Banana, Tomato, Okra and Chilli crops are worked out and are as given below. The life of the drip system components usually lasts 5 years for laterals and emission devices and about 10 years for mains and submains. The cost of materials of drip irrigation system is given in Table 1.8 and cost estimation for different crops (Coconut, Aonla, Banana, Tomato, Okra, Chillies) is given in Table 1.9 and Table 1.10.
 
Materials Cost 
12 mm Lateral Pipe Rs 3.75/m
16 mm Lateral Pipe Rs. 5.80/m
2” Pipe Rs. 186.00/ 6 m
1 ¼” Pipe Rs. 112.00/ 6 m
12 mm start, washer and end cap Rs. 4.50/ 1 set
16 mm start, washer and end cap Rs. 6.80/ 1 set
Emitter 4 lph, 8 lph, 16 lph (Open type) Rs. 2.80/- each
12 mm connector Rs. 1.00/-each
16 mm connector Rs. 1.50/- each
Dummy Rs. 0.30/- each
2” Venturi with accessories Rs. 2000/- each
1 ¼” Ball valve Rs. 120/- each
2” Ball valve Rs. 180/- each
2 ½” Ball valve Rs. 250/- each
5 HP motor pump set Rs. 10000/- each
Screen Filter – 2” size Rs. 3500/- each
Seedlings Plantation cost:  
Coconut Rs. 20/- per tree
Banana Rs. 5/- per tree
Vegetables (lump sum) Rs. 1000/- per acre
 
Table 1.9 Cost estimation for Coconut, Aonla and Banana
 
Particulars
Crops
Coconut
Aonla
Banana
Area 4000 m2 (100x40) 4000 m2 (100x40) 4000 m2 (100x40)
Plant spacing 7m x 7m 6m x 6m 2m x 2m
No.of rows 15 17 50
No. of plants per row 7 8 20
Total no. of plants 15x7 = 105 17x8 = 136 50x20 = 1000
Water requirement of crop 64 lpd (4x4x4) 30 lpd (2x4x3.8) 20 lpd (2x4x2.5)
No. of emitters per plant 4 (4 lph capacity) 2 (4 lph capacity) 2 (4 lph capacity)
No. of hours of operation of pump 4 3.8 2.5
Total no. of emitters per acre 105 x 4 = 420 136x2 = 272 1000x2 = 2000
Length of sub-main pipe (50 mm dia) 100m 100m 100m
Length of laterals 630 m (16 mmF) 700 m (12 mmF) 2000 m (12 mmF)
Cost of drip system:      
Cost of sub-main pipe Rs. 3162/- Rs. 3162/- Rs. 3162/-
Cost of lateral pipe Rs. 3654/- Rs. 2625/- Rs. 7500/-
Cost of emitters Rs. 1176/- Rs. 762/- Rs. 5600/-
Cost of start, washer and end cap Rs. 204/- Rs. 204/- Rs. 459/-
Cost of connectors Rs. 45/- Rs. 45/- Rs. 102/-
Cost of ball valves Rs. 360/- Rs. 360/- Rs. 360/-
Cost of dummies Rs. 60/- Rs. 60/- Rs. 150/-
2” Venturi with accessories Rs. 2000/- Rs. 2000/- Rs. 2000/-
Screen Filter (2” size) Rs. 3500/- Rs. 3500/- Rs. 3500/-
Erection charges Rs. 750/- Rs. 750/- Rs. 1000/-
Total cost (excluding pumping system) Rs. 14911/- Rs. 13468/- Rs. 23833/-
Cost of 3 HP Motor Pump set Rs.7500/-
Total cost with pumping system (Coconut, Aonla and Banana)
Rs. 59712/-
 
Table 1.10 Cost estimation for Tomato, Okra and Chillies
 
Particulars
Crops
Tomato (winter)
Okra (summer) 4 rows planting at 2.4m lateral distance
Okra (summer) 2 rows planting at 1.2 m lateral distance
Chillies (Rainy season)
Area 4000 m2 (80x50) 4000 m2 (80x50) 4000 m2 (80x50) 4000 m2 (80x50)
Plant spacing 45cm x45 cm 30cm x 40cm 30cm x 60cm 45cm x 30cm
Total no. of emitters per acre 6468 4200 5712 7616
Length of sub-main pipe (50 mm dia) 140m 140m 140m 140m
Length of laterals (12 mmF) 3850 m 1680 m 3360m 4480m
Cost of drip system:        
Cost of sub-main pipe Rs. 2688/- Rs. 2688/- Rs. 2688/- Rs. 2660/-
Cost of lateral pipe Rs. 14438/- Rs. 6300/- Rs. 12600/- Rs. 12544/-
Cost of emitters Rs. 18110/- Rs. 11760/- Rs. 15994/- Rs. 21325/-
Cost of start, washer and end cap Rs. 990/- Rs. 374/- Rs. 374/- Rs. 1008/-
Cost of connectors Rs. 220/- Rs. 100/- Rs. 100/- Rs. 224/-
Cost of ball valves Rs. 360/- Rs. 360/- Rs. 360/- Rs. 360/-
Cost of dummies Rs. 300/- Rs. 150/- Rs. 150/- Rs. 300/-
2” Venturi with accessories Rs. 2000/- Rs. 2000/- Rs. 2000/- Rs. 2000/-
Screen Filter (2” size) Rs. 3500/- Rs. 3500/- Rs. 3500/- Rs. 3500/-
Erection charges Rs. 1000/- Rs. 2500/- Rs. 2500/- Rs. 2500/-
Total cost (excluding pumping system) Rs. 43606/- Rs. 29732/- Rs. 40266/- Rs. 46421/-
3 HP Motor Pump set Rs. 7500/-
Total cost with pumping system* Rs. 53921/-
* A drip system is used for all the three crops grown in a year using the same pump for irrigation
 
  Next 
Untitled Document
 2nd Floor, Himalaya House, 23 KG Marg, New Delhi - 110 001
 Tel. : 011 - 43561047, Fax : 011 - 23313318
 email : ncpah@ncpahindia.com, ncpahindia@yahoo.co.in
 Design By: Nimble Technologies